A Brand’s opportunity to nudge – for good.

By Anika Jessen

In 2017, Richard Thaler was rewarded with the Nobel Prize for Economics. “He makes economic research more human”, declares the official statement. His lifework focuses on the influence of psychology on economic behavior.

But unlike most researchers, Richard Thaler is not just known to the experts in his field. In 2011, he published a book in cooperation with Cass Sunstein, which some of you may know: Nudge. The underlying concept, so called ‘nudging’, is defined as a choice architecture that alters people’s behavior in a predictable way.

nudging2For example: We’re trying to sell the pricier of two services to a potential customer.
Research shows that including higher-priced items in a selection, boosts sales of the second most expensive item. Instead of offering just two services, we add a third service to our offer that is even more expensive.

From this example alone, the potential and challenge of ‘nudging’ become clear: how to use nudging for simplicity without taking away people’s freedom of choice?

Opportunity and responsibility

Brands play a vital role when it comes to choosing between designing a decision architecture and actively controlling decisions. Not only are a brand’s name and popularity crucial for decision-making, but also their choice of language and colors, for example.

The Massachusetts General Hospital tried to increase healthy decision making in their cafeteria. They marked unhealthy choices in red, healthy choices in green. Without even explaining the colors, the purchases of drinks that were marked green increased by 8%, sales of red drinks dropped 9%. 2 years after implementing these changes, red beverage sales were down by 39%! A notable example of the drastic impact of decision architecture from a simple implementation of color variance.

Using a specific wording to address social norms is another great example of the ‘nudging’ principle.

Many people ignored the growing number of letters sent to them by the British tax office and handed in their tax declaration late. The British tax office therefore added phrases such as “Nine out of ten people pay their tax on time” with the intention of making would-be late-responders feel left out. The rate of on-time tax declaration submissions went up 15% on average!

Many years before the concept of nudging was brought into being, Alka-Seltzer, a producer of fizzy tablets that help with headaches, followed the advice of a psychologist and managed to create a social norm around using two tablets a time. Their famous slogan “Plop, Plop, Fizz, Fizz”, combined with TV advertisement led them to a double in sales!

But despite this being a stroke of genius from an economic perspective, manipulating people on this scale represents a big risk to the image of the company–not to mention to the health of their customers in this case. Would you ever buy another headache pill from Alka-Seltzer if you found out that you had been nudged into a carefully planned decision architecture?

The potential of nudging for brands

As the saying goes, “with great power comes great responsibility”, and in this, nudging is no different. Brands have long been using nudges, yet their full potential has not been reached.

nudging1
Figure 1 – three potential uses of nudges for brands

 

Numbers—Selling more products: Just as Alka-Seltzer did, nudges can plainly be used by brands to sell more products and increase the numbers of a company. Ethical principles and long-term thinking have no place here. Making use of nudges in this way is effective but only short-term.

Wishes—Selling the right products: If we want our customers to be loyal to our brand, we need to nudge more sustainably, by actually selling something our customers want to have. A clear definition of target groups is followed by addressing the right person with a product he or she wants to buy. This does not make our sales numbers go through the roof overnight, but it makes the brand appear trustworthy and eventually establishes loyalty to the brand.

Needs—Selling an individual solution: But nudges have even more potential for brands. In a world of overstimulation, where nothing seems to stand out, the most valuable brand is the one that reduces complexity, lights the way to good choices and is known for a product that adds true value to their customers lives. If a brand manages to guide to an individual solution to their customer’s problems by knowing their needs, customer loyalty is only the first sign of a powerful, positive ripple effect.

Nudging as a mutual concept

In order to enable our customers and create a ripple effect, we have to understand their needs. The principles of user-centered design tell us how to do so: asking, listening and observing carefully in order to dig deep into people’s needs. Once we know the user, our brand can create nudges with the help of social norms that the customer actually identifies with, like the tax office did. Or we can play around with colors the customers react to in a certain way, like the Massachusetts General Hospital did. In the age of the Internet of Things, nudges can be taken to a whole new, digital level. The possibilities are limitless.

nudging3To sum it up, creating a nudge of value for a company’s success can only be done in collaboration with the customer. The company uncovers customer needs, builds a choice architecture based on those insights and then enables simple and good decision-making.

Understanding nudging as a mutual concept prevents manipulation and ensures a real benefit for the customer. It’s the key to harness the full potential of nudging for brands.

 

Anika Jessen is Manager Corporate Strategy and Communications at MetaDesign

 

2 Responses

  1. Thanks for the interesting article! You are connecting the world of brand development with the one of proportion development, something that seems a no-brainer, but is hardly properly done or understood at all. Human Centered Design is around for a while and has applied elements of nudging and others in proposition creation – to connect this to brand development makes sense and should be the norm. Though: to achieve this, brand builders also need to be proposition builders, and vice versa. It requires a holistic approach to create brand-service experiences that can achieve the potential you imply.

    Maybe it needs some nudging within companies first, before brands can apply this on their customers!

    1. Anika

      Hi, thanks for your feedback. Yes, I think nudging as a mutual concept can be beneficial in any context in which we need to meet the needs of our counterpart. It’s up to how we perceive our tasks and whom we consider our user/customer, especially in management (servant leadership) – for example to create a culture of participation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.