By Lisa Krick
We can all agree that the future will be governed by Artificial Intelligence and Non Interface. Even today, every fifth search query on Google is submitted by voice command. And Amazon employs over 1000 people just to further develop voice control. But if products and services are primarily controlled by language, how can brands code them and make themselves recognisable?
By Tina Weise
When Hugo Ball initiated the Dada movement in Zurich, I bet he would never have imagined that his idea of random art would become a major influential art trend that has already lasted more than 100 years. After the first night at the Cabaret Voltaire, the idea of creating anti-art and opposing both expressionism and futurism quickly became popular – always bearing the key-principle in mind: to mean absolutely nothing.
By Benito Opitz
That society has become more critical over the last few years is not just a marketing ploy. We are constantly confronted with new examples of how user demands are increasingly specific and hold ever more sway over brands.
Within this article, I will outline two strategies that help brands to deal with the increasing potential for criticism. The secret lies in a higher, more meaningful form of differentiation than we have known in the field of marketing so far. A new form of differentiation that makes brands so meaningful that they might be protected against the hysterical form of social criticism that we observe regularly in the digital age.
By Rupali Steinmeyer
Even at the risk of sounding somewhat polarizing, there is truth to the argument that brands are in a state of paradoxical crisis. The possibility of becoming irrelevant and disappearing is real in this competitive world. Many brands have already been negatively impacted. Some have seen their intrinsic value erode. Others have seen dwindling customers. Several have even folded. And while some manage to work their way back to success, they remain few and far between.
By Cornelius Hummel
Recently, my colleague Matthias Höckh wrote about the dangers of guidance overkill. When implementing a brand in an organization, too much information can be paralyzing and thwart the actual goal: to provide infectious energy and create momentum. That’s why when we define a brand, we try to keep it as simple and as brief as possible. At MetaDesign, we feel strongly about our proprietary brand model, which is based on few but very strong and clear elements.
By Molly Davis Lind
There’s a new startup on the block that is rocking the sleep world – and the brand world.
Casper believes “we are how we sleep” and offers a mattress-in-a-box solution that meets “the Goldilocks standard of ‘just-right’” firmness. Selling between $500 and $950 a pop, shipping is free (and delivered via messenger bike in NYC). Customers can try the mattress for 100 days with no strings attached. But what’s really riveting about Casper is not the product (truth be told: I haven’t tried it) but the actual brand.
One of the biggest challenges brands face is determining how to speak in a way that is unique, relevant to their audiences, and expresses their core brand values. While we tend to experience a brand primarily through our eyes, a brand is more than a design system. This blog entry outlines five key success factors to help you create a strong brand language that is just as powerful as visual imagery.